Giving Back 05/18/2009
 

Driving back from my hour walk with Hal and Charlie this morning, I heard just a bleat of Rush Limbaugh this morning.  I could barely believe my ears.  Limbaugh was, as usual, trying to get a purchase on Obama's character for assassination.  The best he could come up with in the short time I listened was to criticize Obama's urging of young people to "give back" to their communities by opting for government or nonprofit jobs rather than private sector jobs.

If Limbaugh had left it at that, I suppose he could have had a minor point.  These kids haven't really earned much yet, so they may not want to give back until they have a few dollars in the bank.

But Limbaugh went on to question the whole concept of giving back.  According to him, it's all some sort of guilt trip based on the idea that

a) You cheated somehow to get ahead or

b) You don't deserve what you earned.

Here's a newsflash for Limbaugh and the ditto-heads:  Giving back is NOT about guilt or unworthiness.  It's not an evil conspiracy to get into your pockets.

People who choose to share their skills, talents or money with those members of our society who need it most are more often motivated by a sense of compassion, of generosity, and a common sense of shared humanity.

Yes, Rush.  That's right.  You share humanity with all those terrible folks upon whom you look down from your lofty heights.  In you, that seems to motivate disdain.  In others, it motivates humanity.

 


Comments

Tue, 19 May 2009 07:44:18

Laura, arguing with rush (or his dittoheads) is an exercise in self-aggravation. His job is to take whatever the other side does and spin it as wrong. If Obama had urged kids to take private sector jobs to earn and restart the economy as well as give back to private, faith-based charities, Limbaugh would have spun that as a guilt trip, or some other disingenuous cover for a sinister plot. It's a giant rhetorical game, one most of us outgrew in about third grade when people stopped laughing at our cleverness when we "trapped" someone we didn't like by asking "Does your mother know you wet the bed?"

 

Peter Lowin

Wed, 20 May 2009 09:46:35

Rush is huge dope and the sad thing is that he gets paid for sharing his views. Which is worse, someone with his views or the people who pay to put him on the air?

 

Laura

Sat, 23 May 2009 19:36:28

Good point, Ken. I sometimes forget that many conservatives don't take Rush seriously.

I hear him quoted often enough to be concerned sometimes...and so I do listen occasionally for as long as it's possible to endure...just so I can see what echoes are coming down the political tunnel.

 

Laura

Sat, 23 May 2009 19:38:04

Peter,

I think he gets paid a LOT, too. So obviously, a lot of folks listen.

Maybe I should do my part by tuning him out? Fewer listeners = fewer commercials = no more Rush!

 



Leave a Reply