I had an interesting talk last week with Hal (as Charlie was walking and running us), we had an interesting discussion about Carrie Prejean--the Miss California who was asked her opinion of gay marriage during the Miss USA pageant.

Here is her response

"Well, I think it's great that Americans are able to choose one or the other.  We live in a land where you can choose same sex marriage or opposite marriage and ... you know what, in my country and in my family, I think that I believe a marriage should be between a man and a woman--no offense to anybody out there--but that's how I was raised and that's how I think it should be, between a man and a woman.  Thank you.'

Since that answer, Carrie Prejean's fame has grown as she's been vilified by gay activists and sainted by the religious (and irreligious) right.  I agree with Hal that Carrie had a right to her opinion and to freely express her opinion on that stage.

Soon after she gave her answer, Celebrity blogger  and pageant judge, Perez Hilton went on camera and said she lost the title of Miss USA not because of her controversial answer but because she was a "dumb b*tch and a divisive personality rather than an uniting personality.  He also said, rather hubristically, that he was "the...moment" of the pageant.  Get over yourself, girlfriend.

Perez Hilton, by the way, is equally entitled to his opinion and to the free speech protections that Carrie Prejean holds so dear in every interview since.

I quibble with Perez Hilton's vlog about the answer and Carrie Prejean because he resorted to personal attacks rather than reasoned argument for the ways in which he took issue with Prejean's answer.

In a similar way, I have issues with Carrie Prejean's answer.  First she states, inaccurately, that it's great to live in a country where people can "choose" same sex marriage.  Very few people in very select parts of the country can make that choice.  So she overstates her initial attempt at an appeasement answer.

Then she stops herself and reverses course.  And I especially note the words, "in my country" that marriage should be between a man and a woman.  This is her genunine opinion and she has the right to voice it.  However, it sends chills up my spine because that's exactly the point...it's not just Carrie Prejean's country, it's my country and the country of my gay friends and relatives.

Various defenders have pointed out that she was representing California because the "majority" of Californian's voted for Proposition 8.  But they neglect to mention that it was a bare majority, not a landslide by any means.

In later interviews, a couple of other comments by Prejean really rankled me.  When asked her opinion of Perez, she said she would be "praying for him" and that he's obviously angry and hurt about something greater in his life.  And she knows this how?  She doesn't.  It's the typical "christian" answer that says see how pious I am, pitying this poor creature who is attacking me.

She also said instead of being politically correct, she chose to be biblically correct.  I'd love to sit down and talk with her about the 7 instances which could remotely be interpreted as being condemnations of homosexual activity.  And at the same time I wonder about a young woman who claims to adhere to biblical principals as a guide yet prior to this had stated, according to the LA Times, that her goal was to be a Victoria's Secret model and who surgically enhanced her bust size in order to do better in the contest.  While neither is directly addressed in the bible, there are more urgings of women to be modest in their dress than there are strictures supposedly against homosexual acts.

The lessons I hope we all can take away from this brouhaha are:

1.  People in the USA enjoy the right to free speech.

2.  If one disagrees with another's opinion, it's best to disagree with the opinion, form counterarguments, etc., than to attack the person (whether you do it by name calling as Hilton did or pseudo-piety as Prejean did).

3.  If you put yourself in the public eye, you'd best be better prepared to defend your opinion than saying "that's the way I was raised."  Otherwise, the arguments will keep on coming.

Such is my not so humble opinion.  Now off to yoga!



 


Comments

Wed, 13 May 2009 19:58:24

Shana Moakler quit the Miss USA Pageant because of it.... citing that it was more important to be a role model to her children than to be part of that organization anymore. Love her.

 

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:38:50

Everyone got exactly what they wanted in this exchange. Hilton asked a question and got exactly the answer he wanted so that he could rehearse a perceived grievance.

Prejean got exactly the question she wanted so that she could have something more valuable than a pageant title--a platform for her to express her beliefs that she could frame as "standing up" rather than lashing out. The pageant directors got a manufactured conflict to draw attention to a cultural artifact that people haven't paid attention to in years (raise your hand if you even knew the pageant had happened).Most importantly everyone got to go back to their corner and be think of themselves as the aggrieved party, accepting the "attaboy/girl"s from their base and winking the whole time at their enmeshed complicity with their alleged cultural enemies but secretly glad to have them so that they can continue to stoke the fires of their respective persecution complexes while those of us with actual lives to lead yawn and move on.

 

Laura

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:46:27

I saw she quit, just didn't hear why. And on other side, we have the Donald.

Not so in love with him.

So Moakler is the only one who actually expressed an opinion with action behind it. Hmm...strange world.

 

Laura

Thu, 14 May 2009 10:48:03

Ken,

A good analysis of what everyone gained from this exercise. And a good part of the reason why I didn't write about it at first...but I do manage to still get rankled by the holier than thou point of view spoken from a clearly limited amount of critical thinking.

So...to sum up...I couldn't resist.


Enjoy Star Trek!

 



Leave a Reply